Current Affairs

HC reserves judgement on Goa Lokayukta appointment case

A Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Goa comprising of Justice A.P. Lavande and Justice U.V. Bakre today after hearing arguments reserved the judgment on the petition filed by Adv. Aires Rodrigues challenging the appointment of Justice B. Sudershan Reddy as Goa’s first Lokayukta.

Adv. Aires Rodrigues has in his petition  submitted before the High Court that Sudershan Reddy’s entire selection and appointment process as Lokayukta of Goa was unlawful and not in accordance with law.

Adv. Rodrigues has submitted that the Goa Government instead of requesting the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court to recommend names for the post of Lokayukta, had high-handedly and unlawfully appointed a search committee headed by Advocate General Atmaram Nadkarni to select the Lokayukta.

Pointing out that Sudershan Reddy was selected as Lokayukta by an unlawful search committee appointed by the government which was headed by Advocate General Atmaram Nadkarni, Adv. Rodrigues has stated that the Lokayukta being a quasi-judicial authority, the selection and appointment had to be on the basis of the doctrine of separation of powers, with the primacy vested in the Chief Justice.

Adv. Rodrigues has in his petition further stated that the entire selection process was not transparent as the intention of the Government was to select and appoint a Lokayukta of the choice of the ruling party and of its Chief Minister.

Adv. Rodrigues has further submitted that the consultation  process by the Chief Minister with the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court and the Leader of the Opposition was not a meaningful consultation as required by law but was reduced to a mere formality and a glaring eye wash.

It may be recalled that Justice Sudershan Reddy was sworn in as Lokayukta of Goa on 16h March amidst public protests. All the Opposition parties boycotted his swearing in ceremony which was held at Raj Bhavan in Dona Paula and was also not attended by many Ministers and ruling party MLAs.


Leave a Reply

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker