In a recent and concerning study conducted by renowned Japanese virologists, professors Atsushi Tanaka and Takayuki Miyazawa, of Osaka Medical University and Kyoto University, suggests that all the variants of the COVID-19 virus were engineered in biolabs and were intentionally released upon humanity.
As per the report, first published in August 2023, the push to keep COVID-19 around is part of a nefarious ‘deep-state scheme’, to remove our individual freedoms and control us. This scientific conclusion reached at by Tanaka and Miyazawa, adds massively to the already existing recognition of the US Department of Energy, the CIA, and the FBI, of the possibility of the SARS-CoV-2 having been made in a laboratory.
And even though this scientific debate, discussing the origins of the virus, is going on since 2020 itself, it has been slow to get a proper investigation in a public forum, because of the specialized and colossal nature of the conversation, and the topic being highly censored.
In their 25-page paper, titled ‘Unnaturalness in the Evolution Process of the SARS-CoV-2 Variants and the Possibility of Deliberate Natural Selection’, Tanaka and Miyazawa have determined the order of mutations of the Omicron variant. They traced the origins of the variant by studying viral sequences found ‘in the wild’ around the world, that had been deposited into public databases. The duo of researchers explained that the objective of their study is to ‘clarify the evolutionary processes leading to the formation of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, focusing on Omicron variants with many amino acid mutations in the spike protein among SARS-CoV-2 isolates.’
During the course of their research, they found about 100 separate Omicron subvariants that could not possibly have arisen naturally. The existence of these variants and the systematic order in which they appeared, provide conclusive evidence of large-scale lab creation and release of COVID-19 viruses.
Specifically, to determine the order of mutations leading to the formation of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, Tanaka and Miyazawa compared the sequences of 129 Omicron BA.1-related isolates, 141 BA.1.1-related isolates, and 122 BA.2-related isolates, and attempted to clarify the evolutionary processes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants, including the order of mutations leading to their formation and the occurrence of homologous recombination.
Looking at their findings, the researchers commented, ‘As a result, we concluded that the formation of part of Omicron isolated BA.1, BA.1.1, and BA.2 was not the product of genome evolution, as is commonly observed in nature, such as the accumulation of mutations and homologous recombination. Furthermore, the study of 35 recombinant isolates of Omicron variants BA.1 and BA.2 confirmed that Omicron variants were already present in 2020. The analysis showed that Omicron variants were formed by an entirely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology, and knowing how the SARS-CoV-2 variants were formed prompts a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.’
‘These results suggest that the establishment of BA.1-0.1 and BA.1.1-0.1 isolates occurred independently. On the other hand, if reversion mutations caused each of these isolates with one amino acid different to the Wuhan-type, these isolates could be detected by examining an astronomical number of isolates. However, these virus strains were detected in the number of sequenced whole genomes (a limited number), rather than in astronomical numbers examined. The fact that most of these mutations occurred without synonymous mutations suggests that none of them arose as a result of trial-and-error random mutations in nature.’, they further added.
Concluding their study, Tanaka and Miyazawa state, ‘Nonetheless, the analysis we have shown here concludes that the Omicron variants were formed by a completely new mechanism that cannot be explained by previous biology. The process of how SARS-CoV-2 mutations occurred should prompt a reconsideration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. If the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic strain is an artificially mutated virus and if the corona hoopla was a well-designed global experiment in human inoculation and a social experiment, then the design of this experiment and the nature of the virus used make it likely that this experiment is a preliminary experiment.’
