15.6 C
Delhi
Monday, February 26, 2024

No sufficient data for the Intelligence Community but COVID-19 not a biological weapon: US Office of Director of National Intelligence

Date:

Share post:

Donate-GC-Razorpay

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence of the United States of America has through feedback of the Intelligence Community assessment summarised that the COVID-19 is not a biological weapon.

However, the Intelligence Community is of the opinion that it could have been caused by a natural occurrence or an accident at Wuhan lab.

Intriguigly, while the Intelligence Community it rues the fact that it lacks clinical samples or a complete understanding of epidemiological data from the earliest COVID-19 cases. It has arrived at the conclusion that it is not a bioweapon from China and that China’s official did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initiat outbreak emerged of COVID-19.

The Unclassified Summary of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence stated:

SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, probably emerged and infected humans through an initial small-scale exposure that occurred no later than November 2019 with the first known cluster of COVID-19 cases arising in Wuhan, China in December 2019.

“In addition, the Intelligence Community (IC) was able to reach broad agreement on several other key issues. We judge the virus was not developed as a biological weapon. Most agencies also assess with low confidence that SARS-CoV-2 probably was not genetically engineered; however, two agencies believe there was not sufficient evidence to make an assessment either way. Finally, the IC assesses China’s officials did not have foreknowledge of the virus before the initial outbreak of COVID-19 emerged.”

The summary further stated that the IC remains divided on the most likely origin of COVID-19.

All agencies assess that two hypotheses are plausible: natural exposure to an infected animal and a laboratory-associated incident.

Four IC elements and the National Intelligence Council assess with low confidence that the initial SARS-CoV-2 infection was most likely caused by natural exposure to an animal infected with it or a close progenitor virus—a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARS-CoV-2. These analysts give weight to China’s officials’ lack of foreknowledge, the numerous vectors for natural exposure, and other factors.

One IC element assesses with moderate confidence that the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was the result of a laboratory-associated incident, probably involving experimentation, animal handling, or sampling by the Wuhan Institute of Virology. These analysts give weight to the inherently risky nature of work on coronaviruses.

Analysts at three IC elements remain unable to coalesce around either explanation without additional information, with some analysts favoring natural origin, others a laboratory origin, and some seeing the hypotheses as equally likely.

Variations in analytic views largely stem from differences in how agencies weigh intelligence reporting and scientific publications, and intelligence and scientific gaps.

Interestingly the IC judges were unable to provide a more definitive explanation for the origin of COVID-19 unless new information allows them to determine the specific pathway for initial natural contact with an animal or to determine that a laboratory in Wuhan was handling SARS- CoV-2 or a close progenitor virus before COVID-19 emerged.

The summary further states, “The IC—and the global scientific community—lacks clinical samples or a complete understanding of epidemiological data from the earliest COVID-19 cases. If we obtain information on the earliest cases that identified a location of interest or occupational exposure, it may alter our evaluation of hypotheses.

China’s cooperation most likely would be needed to reach a conclusive assessment of the origins of COVID-19. Beijing, however, continues to hinder the global investigation, resist sharing information and blame other countries, including the United States. These actions reflect, in part, China’s government’s own uncertainty about where an investigation could lead as well as its frustration the international community is using the issue to exert political pressure on China.”

Unclassified-Summary-of-Assessment-on-COVID-19-Origins

 

Related articles

18 reasons why Modi is not a dictator but a saviour of India

Recently a social media influencer based in Germany made a YouTube video in which he criticized and labeled...

Tier 2 and 3 cities will define new modernity for India: Author Shashank Mani

The tier 2 and tier 3 cities are abode to majority of Indians, but often, this ‘middle’ of...

Is Feydhoo Finolhu Island in Maldives housing a Chinese military outpost?

China has been aggressively pushing its geopolitical strategy 'String of Pearls' in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). Maldives is...

Man who put up ‘Gyanvapi Mandir’ sticker tortured by Varanasi police, implicated in false cases

In early February, it was reported that a man belonging in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, Roshan Pandey, who is...