CJI recuses from Yediyurappa case

New Delhi: Chief Justice U U Lalit has recused himself from hearing a plea filed by former Karnataka Chief Minister B S Yediyurappa and Industries Minister Murugesh Nirani, challenging the Karnataka High Court’s order allowing criminal proceedings against them in a case relating to their failure to grant a parcel of land to a noted Bengaluru-based industrialist.

“I cannot take this matter. List it before a bench where I am not a member. I have some difficulty, I can’t take this matter,” the CJI stated.

After pronouncing his decision, he posted the matter before another Bench after Diwali.

The matter was being heard by a Bench presided over by the CJI and Justice Hemant Gupta.

The case pertains to the appellants’ failure to grant 26 acres of land to industrialist M Alam Pasha in 2011.

Pasha had accused Yediyurappa and Nirani and others of allegedly forging the documents to show the withdrawal of approval of 26 acres of land to him in Devanahalli Industrial Area in Bengaluru Rural.

The complainant sought action against them for the alleged offences punishable under sections 418, 465, 468, 471 read with 120B of IPC and sections 131(c), 13(1)(d)(ii) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Yediyurappa and Nirani had approached the apex court after the criminal proceedings against them were ordered by Karnataka High Court on January 5 last year.

In their plea, they raised a legal query asking whether a court can initiate proceedings under the Prevention of Corruption Act against a public servant without prior sanction.

On January 27, 2021, the apex court granted interim protection from arrest to Yediyurappa in the matter, but ordered for continuation of criminal proceedings against the defendants.

A couple of days back, Pasha filed an interlocutory application attached to the main petition before the Supreme Court, praying for conduct of fair trial against Yediyurappa, Nirani and others, by lifting the protection given to the former Chief Minister from arrest in the matter.

He contended that without lifting the stay on Yediyurappa’s arrest, the investigation authorities cannot proceed further conducting fair investigation.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

The #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign is gaining strong ground all across...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Cabinet Reshuffle: Young Faces, Old Trousers, Women Designers & a Wardrobe Revolution

Key TakeawaysThe Old Trousers metaphor highlights how veteran politicians...

Houses Set Ablaze, Pastor Injured as Three Liangmai Naga Villages Were Attacked

Key TakeawaysThe Three Liangmai Naga villages were targeted in...

Why India Needs Indigenous Datalinks for Its Missiles and Defence Systems

Key TakeawaysThe Indian defence modernisation budget allocates massive funds...

The World Is Moving From Ownership to Access

Key TakeawaysThe shift from ownership to access is redefining...

The Hexagon of Alliances: How India and Israel Can Build a Counterweight to the Mecca Agreement

Key TakeawaysThe Hexagon of Alliances proposes a six‑nation network...

Haryana courts face 15.54 Lakh pending cases; Gurugram tops backlog with 3.07 Lakh

Key TakeawaysHaryana courts are burdened with 15.54 lakh pending...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img