29.1 C
Delhi
Sunday, May 31, 2026

Delhi HC upholds conviction of three Delhi Police personnel in 2013 sexual harassment case

New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction of three Delhi Police personnel in a 2013 sexual harassment case including a woman and her minor niece, directing the convicts to surrender before the trial court within five days.

The Court ruled that no leniency will be granted given the nature of the offence and the fact that the convicts were law enforcement officers who violated the very law they were meant to uphold.

The three convicts, Jaidev, Jagmal, and Suraj Bhan alias Monu were found guilty under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The Court noted that the incident occurred in May 2013 and involved repeated misconduct by the convicts, who were also neighbours of the complainant.

The High Court observed that the convicts, despite being public servants, had persistently engaged in inappropriate behaviour, including making vulgar gestures, sexually explicit remarks, and, in one instance, indecent exposure in the presence of the complainant and her niece. The Court rejected claims for leniency based on the age, health conditions, or family responsibilities, citing the seriousness of the offences and their prolonged nature.

The judgment showcased that the case did not merit a rehabilitative approach due to the aggravating circumstances, including the convicts’ positions in the police force and the repeated nature of the acts. The Court further noted that other FIRs had been registered by the complainant in subsequent years, indicating ongoing harassment and misconduct.

Citing Supreme Court precedents, the High Court highlighted that sentencing must be proportionate to the gravity of the crime and serve as a deterrent, especially when the perpetrators hold positions of authority. The Court concluded that a punitive approach was necessary to restore public confidence in the justice system.

All sentences will run concurrently, and the High Court directed that its order be sent to the trial court to ensure compliance.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

In the world’s frantic race for energy dominance, the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

The #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign is gaining strong ground all across...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

The Niyogi Committee: A Forgotten Warning India Cannot Afford to Ignore

History has a peculiar way of repeating itself when...

ULIP Investment Plan: How It Works and Who Should Invest

Financial goals often need two things working together: protection...

Cuba 2026: Why Havana Suddenly Matters Again

While much Indian attention remains focused on U.S. Secretary...

The ‘WhatsAppisation’ of Corporate India

AI-driven messaging is reshaping customer engagement — but at...

What Makes the Diamond Necklace for Women a Perfect Lifelong Keepsake?

Jewellery often becomes special long before it is placed...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img