29.1 C
Delhi
Thursday, April 23, 2026

Panel of PM, LoP, CJI to appoint CEC, ECs: SC verdict

Date:

Share post:

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday in its landmark verdict, ruled that a panel of Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition and Chief Justice of India would make appointment to the post of Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners until a law is put in place in this regard.

A five-judge bench led by Justice K M Joseph noted lacuna in the process of appointment poll panel under Article 324 of the Constitution, saying the EC should remain aloof from all sorts of interference by the Executive.

The Supreme Court passed the ruling on a batch of petitions were filed by Anoop Barnwal, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, NGO- Association for Democratic Reforms and Dr Jaya Thakur seeking an independent mechanism for appointment of CEC and ECs.

“The CEC and ECs will be selected by a panel comprising PM, LoP/leader of the single largest party & the CJI until parliament brings a law in this regard,” the Supreme Court said, in its ruling today.

“A vulnerable EC would result in insidious situation,” the bench said, adding democracy can succeed only if all stakeholders work on to maintain purity of the election process to reflect will of the people.

“A person in state of obligation to the State cannot have an independent frame of mind,” the bench added.

The five-judge, also comprising Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Hrishikesh Roy and C T Ravikumar passed the unanimous judgement.

Justice Rastogi, however, gave his own separate reasonings.

Justice Rastogi added the procedure to remove CEC should also apply to the removal of ECs. CEC can be removed only through impeachment.

“The founding fathers of the constitution left it for the Parliament to frame law for appointment of Chief Election commissioner and ECs but political dispensations betrayed the trust and the law has not framed in the last seven decades or so,” the Supreme Court said, in its verdict.

“The ECI is duty bound to act in free and fair manner, must act within the Constitutional framework and guidelines,” the Top Court also said in its ruling.

Related articles

Past Lessons, Future Risks: The Iran Ceasefire and the Shifting Balance of Power

The two week US-Iran ceasefire expires on 22 Apr. It was more of a tactical pause than a...

Honour Lord Parshuram by Fighting Corruption, Not Enabling It

 Goa does not suffer from a shortage of symbols. It suffers from a shortage of spine.Every few months,...

Trump Can Block the Persian Gulf, But the Caspian Sea Is Iran’s Backdoor

There is a tendency in global strategic thinking - particularly in Washington - to assume that geography behaves...

It is Time for ‘Shakti’ to Rise: Women’s Reservation as India’s Democratic Awakening

India today stands at the cusp of a long-overdue democratic correction. For decades, the country that prides itself...