Trump doubts NATO’s commitment to U.S., mulls policy change

Key Takeaways

  • U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed doubts about NATO’s commitment to defend America.
  • Trump is considering a policy change that could impact collective defense.
  • The potential policy shift could lead to a significant shift away from Article 5, which says an attack on any NATO country is an attack on all of them.

Washington: U.S. President Donald Trump once again questioned the role of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), casting doubt on whether other members of the military alliance would defend America if it were attacked.

“You know the biggest problem I have with NATO? … I know the guys very well. They’re friends of mine. But if the United States was in trouble, and we called them … Do you think they’re going to come and protect us? They’re supposed to. I’m not so sure,” Trump said Thursday in the Oval Office.

French President Emmanuel Macron responded to Trump’s remarks by telling reporters at a European Union summit Thursday in Brussels that France and the United States have “always been there for each other” throughout history.

France had shown “respect and friendship” toward the United States, Macron said. “I think we’re entitled to expect the same.”

The French leader also mentioned that NATO members joined the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan after the 9/11 terror attacks.

The first and only time Article 5 was invoked was in 2001, following the 9/11 terror attacks, marking a significant moment in NATO’s collective defense history.

“Not only the French, but the Europeans were there when we were called for Afghanistan. And by the way, they weren’t politely warned when (the U.S. left Afghanistan),” Macron said. “We are loyal and faithful allies.”

Trump, who has criticized other NATO members for not spending enough on defense, is considering a major change to Washington’s engagement with NATO, NBC News reported.

As part of the potential policy shift, the United States might not defend a fellow NATO member that is attacked if the country does not meet a certain defense spending threshold set by Washington, it said, citing anonymous officials.

Should the policy change be implemented, it would mark a significant shift away from Article 5, which says an attack on any NATO country is an attack on all of them.

In addition, the United States may also prioritize military exercises with NATO members that are spending a set percentage of their GDP on defense, according to the report.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Why Did the Church Not Report the POCSO Matter?

The arrest of Fr Cyprian Pinto of St Vincent...

Modi Must Resign!

Narendra Modi must resign. Yes, you read that correctly....

People of India Will Rise Against Anarchy

There comes a moment in the history of every...

The Peptide Economy: When the Pursuit of a Better Body Outruns Ethics

A 35-year-old Mumbai actor wanted a better body. His...

Mentoring and lessons of a lifetime – Dr APJ Abdul Kalam

As the country moves ahead towards making India “Viksit...

Rahul Gandhi, You Have Made the Biggest Mistake of Your Political Career

Rahul Gandhi, political disagreements are part of democracy. They...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img