SC permits meat vendors in Panjim to operate from temporary fish market

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court granted meat vendors in Panjim temporary allotment of fixed spots in the southeastern part of a fish market.
  • The building where meat vendors operated was demolished due to its dangerous and dilapidated condition.
  • The Supreme Court allowed the meat vendors to install fridges, mincers, and mincing machines with provisions for electricity and water.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has granted displaced meat vendors in Panjim, Goa, temporary allotment of fixed spots in the southeastern part of a fish market after the demolition of a building where they had operated as lessees for over 30 years.

The demolition was carried out by the City Corporation of Panaji (CCP) due to the building’s dangerous and dilapidated condition.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice SC Sharma, was hearing an appeal challenging a Bombay High Court order that directed the CCP to construct and maintain public markets and slaughterhouses while regulating them during the interim period in the public interest.

The CCP contended that the High Court’s direction exceeded its statutory mandate under Section 59 of the City of Panaji Corporation Act, 2002. Notably, Section 59(1)(o) requires the CCP to take necessary measures for the “construction and maintenance of public markets and slaughterhouses and the regulation of all markets and slaughterhouses.”

During the hearing, the CCP informed the Court that it had passed a resolution on January 24 agreeing to provide fixed spots to six meat vendors in the southeastern section of the temporary fish market.

The vendors’ counsel sought additional permission to install fridges, mincers, and mincing machines with provisions for electricity and water. They also requested that the allotted area be enclosed and secured. The Court allowed these requests while clarifying that the allotment would be strictly temporary.

The Court declined to address issues raised by non-meat vendors, advising them to file civil suits if they wished to enforce their lease rights.

The meat vendors were represented by Senior Advocate Atmaram NS Nadkarni and advocates Rohit Braz D’sa and S.S. Rebello. Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar appeared on behalf of the CCP.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Could a Christian Nation in the Indian Subcontinent Become a Reality?

Key TakeawaysThe Indian Subcontinent hosts significant Christian populations, especially...

Cabinet Reshuffle: Young Faces, Old Trousers, Women Designers & a Wardrobe Revolution

Key TakeawaysThe Old Trousers metaphor highlights how veteran politicians...

Houses Set Ablaze, Pastor Injured as Three Liangmai Naga Villages Were Attacked

Key TakeawaysThe Three Liangmai Naga villages were targeted in...

Why India Needs Indigenous Datalinks for Its Missiles and Defence Systems

Key TakeawaysThe Indian defence modernisation budget allocates massive funds...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img