SC permits meat vendors in Panjim to operate from temporary fish market

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court granted meat vendors in Panjim temporary allotment of fixed spots in the southeastern part of a fish market.
  • The building where meat vendors operated was demolished due to its dangerous and dilapidated condition.
  • The Supreme Court allowed the meat vendors to install fridges, mincers, and mincing machines with provisions for electricity and water.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court has granted displaced meat vendors in Panjim, Goa, temporary allotment of fixed spots in the southeastern part of a fish market after the demolition of a building where they had operated as lessees for over 30 years.

The demolition was carried out by the City Corporation of Panaji (CCP) due to the building’s dangerous and dilapidated condition.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice SC Sharma, was hearing an appeal challenging a Bombay High Court order that directed the CCP to construct and maintain public markets and slaughterhouses while regulating them during the interim period in the public interest.

The CCP contended that the High Court’s direction exceeded its statutory mandate under Section 59 of the City of Panaji Corporation Act, 2002. Notably, Section 59(1)(o) requires the CCP to take necessary measures for the “construction and maintenance of public markets and slaughterhouses and the regulation of all markets and slaughterhouses.”

During the hearing, the CCP informed the Court that it had passed a resolution on January 24 agreeing to provide fixed spots to six meat vendors in the southeastern section of the temporary fish market.

The vendors’ counsel sought additional permission to install fridges, mincers, and mincing machines with provisions for electricity and water. They also requested that the allotted area be enclosed and secured. The Court allowed these requests while clarifying that the allotment would be strictly temporary.

The Court declined to address issues raised by non-meat vendors, advising them to file civil suits if they wished to enforce their lease rights.

The meat vendors were represented by Senior Advocate Atmaram NS Nadkarni and advocates Rohit Braz D’sa and S.S. Rebello. Senior Advocate Ranjit Kumar appeared on behalf of the CCP.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Church Bias Against Israel While Being Pro-Palestine

Key TakeawaysThe Bias Against Israel debate highlights tension between...

Next-Gen Chefs Will Be Robots

Key TakeawaysThe rise of robotic kitchens is turning kitchens...

Goa Needs a Desalination Plant Before Water Security Becomes a Crisis

Key TakeawaysThe tourism boom in Goa adds millions of...

BRICS 2026: India Must Ensure China Does Not Become the Voice of the Global South

Key TakeawaysIndia’s BRICS 2026 presidency seeks to prevent a...

Turkey’s Banking Gateway to Iran: How Oil Money Finds Its Way Back to Tehran

Key TakeawaysThe Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi acted as a...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img