South Africa welcomes UN Court’s ruling on Israel’s settlement activity

Key Takeaways

  • South Africa welcomes the UN Court’s ruling on Israel’s settlement activity in Palestinian territories.
  • The UN Court has ruled that Israel’s settlement activity violates international law and constitutes annexation.
  • South Africa calls for an end to Israel’s illegal actions in the Palestinian territories and demands reparations for the damage caused.

Cape Town: The government of South Africa welcomes the advisory opinion of the UN International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legal consequences of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, the South African Foreign Ministry said.

On Friday, the UN court issued an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories. The ICJ ruled that Israeli settlement activity violates international law and constitutes annexation. The court called on Israel to cease its new settlement activities and its illegal presence in the Palestinian territories, and to pay reparations for the damage caused by the occupation.

“The Government of South Africa welcomes the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice issued today in The Hague in respect of the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem,” the ministry said in a statement on Friday.

South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola said that the ICJ ruling reflects South Africa’s long-standing position on the illegality of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories, and called on the international community to take action to end Israel’s illegal actions against the Palestinian people.

On December 29, 2023, South Africa filed a lawsuit with the ICJ against Israel over alleged genocide in the Gaza Strip. On January 26, the ICJ ruled provisional measures ordering Israel to take urgent steps to prevent acts of genocide and ensure the flow of humanitarian aid to the enclave. At the same time, the ICJ did not order an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. In early March, the African nation went back to the ICJ to call for additional provisional measures against Israel that would address widespread starvation among Palestinians in the besieged Gaza Strip.

On May 10, South Africa addressed the ICJ with an immediate request to apply additional measures against Israel. On May 16-17, the court held hearings on the matter. On May 24, the court ordered Israel to stop the military operation in Gaza’s southernmost city of Rafah and take measures to ensure access of missions to investigate the accusations of genocide.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Church Bias Against Israel While Being Pro-Palestine

Key TakeawaysThe Bias Against Israel debate highlights tension between...

Next-Gen Chefs Will Be Robots

Key TakeawaysThe rise of robotic kitchens is turning kitchens...

Goa Needs a Desalination Plant Before Water Security Becomes a Crisis

Key TakeawaysThe tourism boom in Goa adds millions of...

BRICS 2026: India Must Ensure China Does Not Become the Voice of the Global South

Key TakeawaysIndia’s BRICS 2026 presidency seeks to prevent a...

Turkey’s Banking Gateway to Iran: How Oil Money Finds Its Way Back to Tehran

Key TakeawaysThe Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi acted as a...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img