TN Guv refuses to re-induct Ponmudy into State Cabinet, DMK to move SC, seeks Guv’s removal

Key Takeaways

  • The Governor refused to re-induct Ponmudy into the State Cabinet, citing constitutional morality and corruption charges.
  • The decision has sparked controversy and demands for Governor Ravi’s removal.
  • The DMK plans to move the Supreme Court against Governor Ravi’s decision.

Chennau: Triggering yet another round of row between the ruling DMK in Tamil Nadu and the Raj Bhavan, Governor R.N. Ravi has refused to re-induct senior DMK leader and former Higher Education Minister K. Ponmudy into the Cabinet even after his conviction and 3 year jail term awarded by the Madras High Court in a disproportionate case, was stayed by the Apex Court.

Taking strong exception to the Governor’s refusal on a request made by Chief Minister M.K.Stalin to re-induct Mr Ponmudy back into the Council of Ministers, the DMK on Monday termed the Governor’s act as a conempt of court and demanded his removal.

Senior Counsel and DMK Rajya Sabha MP P.Wilson said the DMK will move the Supreme Court against the Governor refusing to re-induct Mr Ponmudy into the Cabinet.

Mr Stalin’s had sent a letter on Wednesday to the Governor seeking to re-induct Mr Ponmudy into the Cabinet, and the swearing-in ceremony was expected the next day.

The Governor left for New Delhi on a three-day visit on Thursday morning to consult legal experts. The Apex Court had suspended the conviction and sentence for an interim period, but not totally set it aside.

Upon his return to the city on Sunday evening, the Governor in his reply to the Chief Minister’s letter, said that he refused to re-induct Mr Ponmudy into the Cabinet, saying it would be against constitutional morality to do so.

In a letter to Mr Stalin, Mr. Ravi said it was pertinent to note that the Supreme Court had suspended the conviction by way of interim relief to Mr. Ponmudy. It only meant that the conviction, though existent, had been made non-operative and not set aside, Reports quoting Raj Bhavan sources said.

The offences for which Mr. Ponmudy was held guilty were very serious relating to corruption that he committed as a public servant. “As he remains tainted of corruption, re-induction as Minister would be against constitutional morality and hence, I am unable to accede to your request,” Mr. Ravi was quoted as saying in the letter.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

The #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign is gaining strong ground all across...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Venezuela 2026: From Regime Change to Resource Control

Key TakeawaysThe August Oil Agreement gives the US a...

India Must Push the Spirit of Innovation in the Northeast

India’s Northeast can no longer be viewed merely as...

India Must Lead the Race to Artificial Superintelligence

Key TakeawaysIndia must take the lead in Artificial Superintelligence...

Hamas Wants a Political Future But Has Hamas Changed?

Key TakeawaysHamas has indicated conditional support for a 15-point...

Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: When the Pulpit Becomes a Shield for Predators

Key TakeawaysPriests who sexually assault minors are a betrayal...

Taxing Hope: How Underground Taxation Is Crushing Nagaland’s Entrepreneurs

Key TakeawaysUnderground taxation is crushing Nagaland's entrepreneurs, imposing a...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img