US fines Twitter $350,000 for delay in providing Trump’s records to Justice Dept.

Key Takeaways

  • The Twitter $350,000 fine underscores the DOJ’s enforcement of court orders on social media platforms.
  • Delay in providing Donald Trump records led to a contempt finding and monetary sanction.
  • The case ties into the broader Special Counsel Jack Smith investigation into the 2020 election aftermath.

Washington: The United States is fining the social media company formerly known as Twitter $350,000 for delaying the provision of records pertaining to former US President Donald Trump to the Justice Department, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said in an opinion released Wednesday.

A US district court issued a search warrant in a criminal case, ordering Twitter (now known as X) to provide information to the government on Trump’s account. Twitter delayed the production of the information while unsuccessfully litigating a nondisclosure order restricting them from talking about the warrant.

“Although Twitter ultimately complied with the warrant, the company did not fully produce the requested information until three days after a court-ordered deadline. The district court thus held Twitter in contempt and imposed a $350,000 sanction for its delay,” the filing said. “We affirm the district court in all respects.”

The filing comes following an indictment against Trump on four charges related to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s probe of alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 US presidential election. The case involving Twitter stems from Smith’s investigation, the filing said.

In response to the filing, Trump accused the Justice Department of attempting to derail his 2024 presidential campaign.

“Just found out that Crooked Joe Biden’s DOJ [Department of Justice] secretly attacked my Twitter account, making it a point not to let me know about this major ‘hit’ on my civil rights,” Trump said in a statement via Truth Social.

Trump has frequently characterized legal action against him as a weaponization of the US justice and defended his political speech as protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Why the World Lacks Ethical Integrity to Resolve Global Conflicts

Key TakeawaysThe world lacks Ethical Integrity, leading to inconsistent...

Why Is Return-To-Invoice Cover Different from Regular Own-Damage Protection?

Key TakeawaysThe Return-To-Invoice add‑on helps recover the original purchase...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img