24.6 C
Delhi
Friday, February 20, 2026

Bishop Franco Mulakkal COVID-19 claims in Kottayam Trial Court are fraudulent and false

Date:

Share post:

Kochi: Save Our Sisters (SOS Action Council) who are at the forefront in the fight for justice for 44-year old nun raped by Bishop Franco Mulakkal have told GoaChronicle.com that the details in the application presented in the Kottayam Trial Court by the legal advisors of the rape accused with regards to COVID-19 are fraudulent and false.

When the Kottayam Trial Court summoned the case on July 13, 2020 morning at 10.30, the advocate of the accused informed the court that Bishop Franco Mulakkal was absent and requested for leave. Reason for leave was that his swab had been collected for COVID-19 test. But the test report says that the sample was collected at 11.50 am on July 13th. In fact, Bishop Franco’s legal team lied in the court that the swab sample had been already collected even before the court commenced working.

Four documents were presented in the court, of which the second one was said to be a medical certificate. But it was only an OPD slip from SBLS Taluk hospital.

Third document was the specimen referral form by the doctor for TRUENAT test. Actually TRUENAT test is for emergency purposes only. A genuine referral letter by the doctor in the specified format. It is proven that both these documents are forged/fraudulent. Kottayam Trial Court was misinformed.

The referral letter is signed by Dr. Tarsel Lal. His telephone number is also included therein. When contacted, Dr. Lal informed SOS that he had never issued such a referral letter to Franco.
Hence, it is clear that Bishop Franco Mulakkal has forged the referral letter.

SOS Action Council team contacted Dr. Sethi, the VRDL centre director at Govt. hospital, Jalandhar to get details about the referral letter. He informed that it was only on the basis of the referral letter by Dr. Tarsel Lal, permission was granted for Truenat test. It was not Dr. Sethi, but ENT surgeon, who collected the swab from Franco.

On enquiry, Dr. Harinder Pal Singh, head of the Govt. Hospital Jalandhar, said that PCL test had been conducted for Franco, and the result was negative. Franco consciously concealed this fact from the Hon. Court.

Another stunningly important fact revealed by Dr Harinder is that it was Dr. Alfred, who works in the department of microbiology who drafted the referral letter. He forged the referral letter using the name and signature of another doctor. Dr Alfred had been served notice, seeking explanation. He also informed that the test was positive, while he was unsure of the authenticity of the sample. Only Dr Alfred and the technician know the truth.

SOS Action Council has demanded that Bishop Franco Mulackal should be immediately arrested and tested for Covid-19, and if needed, should be kept under hospital police custody.

Related articles

PLI: Powering India’s Manufacturing Renaissance from Import Dependence to Global Competitiveness

In 2020, when the world was reeling from supply chain disruptions and geopolitical realignments, India chose not to...

Bangladesh After the Faultlines: Can Foreign Policy Hold the Republic Together?

When I wrote in Goa Chronicle about the emerging faultlines within Bangladesh, the argument was not alarmist. It...

India’s AI Moment: Powering the World’s Youngest Nation into a Future-Ready Workforce

On 16th February 2026, the India-AI Impact Summit 2026 did not merely open its doors in New Delhi...

AI for Humanity, Not Hegemony: Modi’s Moral Compass for the Machine Age

At a time when the world is oscillating between awe and anxiety over Artificial Intelligence, Prime Minister Narendra...