SC Constitution Bench begins hearing plea to decide Royalty amount is a form of tax or not

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court’s nine-judge constitution bench is hearing a plea to decide whether the royalty amount paid by mine operators is a form of tax or not.
  • The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 requires mine operators to pay a royalty to the Union government for the right to use, explore and evaluate minerals.
  • If the royalty is not deemed a tax, mine operators will have to pay GST on all mineral extractions, adding significant costs at source.

New Delhi: Supreme Court nine judge constitution bench began the hearing on Tuesday to decide on the mine operators and regulators plea whether the royalty amount paid by the operators to the Union government is a form of tax or not.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Dr DY Chandrachud, Justice Hrishikesh Roy, Justice Abhay S Oka, Justice BV Nagarathna, Justice J.B Pardiwala, Justice Manoj Mishra, Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Augustine George Masih started the hearing at 10.30 Am today.

The question of whether a royalty amount paid by mine operators to the Union government is a form of tax or not has been a long-standing issue. For many years, mine operators and regulators have been trying to settle this question.

All mine operators, under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, are required to pay a ‘royalty to the Union government’ for the right to use, explore and evaluate the minerals.

In 1990, a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court in India Cement Ltd. & Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu first decided that this royalty was a tax as it was “directly or indirectly” proportional to how much mineral had been extracted after the sale by the lessee.

14 years later, a five-judge bench in 2004 ruled the opposite—that royalty on mineral rights was not a tax but an expenditure incurred by the lessee towards the owner of the land who may be a private person or the State.

In 2011, the Court recognized these opposing streams of jurisprudence and referred the case to a nine-judge bench.

After the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax regime in India in 2016, the stakes have become higher. If the royalty is not deemed a tax, mine operators will have to pay GST on all mineral extractions, adding significant costs at source.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

The #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign is gaining strong ground all across...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

India Must Push the Spirit of Innovation in the Northeast

India’s Northeast can no longer be viewed merely as...

India Must Lead the Race to Artificial Superintelligence

Key TakeawaysIndia must take the lead in Artificial Superintelligence...

Hamas Wants a Political Future But Has Hamas Changed?

Key TakeawaysHamas has indicated conditional support for a 15-point...

Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing: When the Pulpit Becomes a Shield for Predators

Key TakeawaysPriests who sexually assault minors are a betrayal...

Taxing Hope: How Underground Taxation Is Crushing Nagaland’s Entrepreneurs

Key TakeawaysUnderground taxation is crushing Nagaland's entrepreneurs, imposing a...

Behind the Wedding Photograph: The Violence Hidden Inside Indian Marriages

Key TakeawaysMarital violence and psychological cruelty are significant...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img