34.5 C
Delhi
Thursday, July 23, 2026

SC dismisses plea for removal of Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking removal of Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Mosque.

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta refused to entertain the appeal filed against an order of the Allahabad High Court which had dismissed the PIL. “It would not be right for us to interfere. Sorry. Not a matter for PIL”, the Supreme Court said, saying it’s a dispute on questions of fact. The court clarified that the petition will not come in the way of any future application.

The Allahabad High Court had in October 2023 rejected the PIL filed by advocate Mahek Maheshwari seeking to recognise Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Mosque as the site of Krishna Janambhoomi (Birthplace of Lord Krishna)

The petitioner cited various historical texts and said, “It is a documented fact that the site is Krishna Janambhoomi and its historical roots could be traced back to the Ramayana era”. The petitioner argued that since Islam has arrived much later than the Ramayana period, the structure cannot be treated as a mosque.

The petitioner urged the court to transfer the land where Shahi Idgah Mosque is situated to the Hindu community. A legitimate trust could be established for the Krishna Janambhoomi Janamsthan which would construct the temple, the petitioner had suggested.

The petitioner said the Shahi Idgah does not qualify for the status of a legitimate mosque under Islamic jurisprudence since a mosque cannot be constructed on land acquired through force. On the other hand, according to Hindu jurisprudence, a temple retains its sacred status even if it lies in ruins, the petitioner said.

The plea also asked for a court-monitored excavation using GPRS technology by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) at the disputed site to ascertain whether the Mosque was constructed over Krishna Janmasthan.

The High Court had dismissed the case after noting that the reliefs sought were already pending consideration before the High Court in related suits. This led to the appeal before the apex court.

A civil suit is already pending before a trial court seeking similar reliefs.

All three courts, the trial court in Uttar Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court, and the Supreme Court had rejected the Hindu Trust’s plea for a scientific survey of the disputed site.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

In the world’s frantic race for energy dominance, the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

The #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign is gaining strong ground all across...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Is FCRA the Real Battlefield?

As I watch the political developments unfolding in India,...

FCRA Amendments: Bharat Strengthens Its Shield Against Opaque Foreign Funding

The Government of Bharat has significantly strengthened the Foreign...

Sindhu Mahakumbh in Ladakh Celebrates India’s Civilisational Heritage and National Unity

The successful conclusion of the 30th Sindhu Darshan Yatra in Ladakh...

How did the U.S. Embassy know so much before the protests took place?

Three days before Delhi witnessed massive protests around Parliament,...

The Right to Protest Ends Where Violence Begins

The right to protest is one of the greatest...

Two Standards, One Region: Saudi Enrichment, Iran and Israel’s Nuclear Dilemma

On 19 February 2026, the Trump administration formally notified...

From Odesa to Oman: The Lethal Cost to Neutral Merchant Mariners

The Anatomy of a High-Seas TragedyThe lethal targeting of...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img