31.1 C
Delhi
Thursday, August 13, 2026

SC dismisses plea for removal of Shahi Idgah Mosque in Mathura

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking removal of Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Mosque.

A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Dipankar Datta refused to entertain the appeal filed against an order of the Allahabad High Court which had dismissed the PIL. “It would not be right for us to interfere. Sorry. Not a matter for PIL”, the Supreme Court said, saying it’s a dispute on questions of fact. The court clarified that the petition will not come in the way of any future application.

The Allahabad High Court had in October 2023 rejected the PIL filed by advocate Mahek Maheshwari seeking to recognise Mathura’s Shahi Idgah Mosque as the site of Krishna Janambhoomi (Birthplace of Lord Krishna)

The petitioner cited various historical texts and said, “It is a documented fact that the site is Krishna Janambhoomi and its historical roots could be traced back to the Ramayana era”. The petitioner argued that since Islam has arrived much later than the Ramayana period, the structure cannot be treated as a mosque.

The petitioner urged the court to transfer the land where Shahi Idgah Mosque is situated to the Hindu community. A legitimate trust could be established for the Krishna Janambhoomi Janamsthan which would construct the temple, the petitioner had suggested.

The petitioner said the Shahi Idgah does not qualify for the status of a legitimate mosque under Islamic jurisprudence since a mosque cannot be constructed on land acquired through force. On the other hand, according to Hindu jurisprudence, a temple retains its sacred status even if it lies in ruins, the petitioner said.

The plea also asked for a court-monitored excavation using GPRS technology by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) at the disputed site to ascertain whether the Mosque was constructed over Krishna Janmasthan.

The High Court had dismissed the case after noting that the reliefs sought were already pending consideration before the High Court in related suits. This led to the appeal before the apex court.

A civil suit is already pending before a trial court seeking similar reliefs.

All three courts, the trial court in Uttar Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court, and the Supreme Court had rejected the Hindu Trust’s plea for a scientific survey of the disputed site.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

In the world’s frantic race for energy dominance, the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

The #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign is gaining strong ground all across...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

11 August and Balochistan: Why Bharat Cannot Afford to Remain a Silent Spectator

Key TakeawaysBharat should acknowledge the significance of 11 August...

What Bhagwan Krishna Can Teach the Government About Facing the FCRA 2026 Battle

Key TakeawaysThe Indian government can learn from Bhagwan...

When AI Turns Every Photograph into a Potential Crime Scene

Key TakeawaysArtificial intelligence is being used to create...

Jharkhand Student Protest: New Prey of Liberal Hypocrisy

Key TakeawaysStudents in Jharkhand have been protesting for 13...

Why is U.S. Representative Riley Riled Up Over FCRA 2026 Amendments in India?

Key TakeawaysUS Representative Riley Moore's criticism of India's FCRA...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img