SC stays defamation proceedings against India Today journalists

Key Takeaways

  • The Supreme Court has stayed defamation proceedings against India Today journalists, seeking the Karnataka government’s response.
  • The defamation case against India Today journalists stems from a sting operation aired by the media outlet in 2016, which alleged that certain MPs in Karnataka were being bribed in exchange for votes ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections.
  • The Karnataka High Court had refused to stay the defamation proceedings against the senior journalists in December 2023, citing the need for further investigation.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the order of the Karnataka High Court which refused to stay the criminal defamation proceedings against India Today group editor Aroon Purie and journalists Rajdeep Sardesai and Shiv Aroor over a sting operation aired by the media outlet in 2016 on an alleged cash-for-votes scam.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, Justice JB Pardiwala, and Justice Manoj Misra, while staying the defamation proceedings against the three journalists, sought the response of the Karnataka government.

The news published by India Today indicated that certain MPs in Karnataka were being bribed in exchange for votes ahead of the Rajya Sabha elections in 2016.

Former state legislator BR Patil, who was among the legislators accused of improprieties in the sting operation report, filed a criminal defamation case against Arun Poorie, Rajdeep Sardesai, and Shiv Aroor the same year.

In December 2023, the Karnataka High Court refused to stay the defamation proceedings against the senior journalists.

On December 18, High Court Judge R Nataraj passed his judgment, noting that the accused India Today show had telecast “doctored graphics” and made derogatory remarks against BR Patil.

The High Court concluded that the offense of making a false electronic record to harm the complainant’s reputation, which is punishable under Section 469 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), was made out.

These allegations required further investigation, the High Court had said but refused to quash the case.

The High Court order was challenged before the Supreme Court.

Senior Advocate Dr S Muralidhar appeared for all three journalists accused in the defamation case.

The Supreme Court, while staying the Defamation proceedings, sent a notice to the Karnataka Government and asked them to reply by July.

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

Church Bias Against Israel While Being Pro-Palestine

Key TakeawaysThe Bias Against Israel debate highlights tension between...

Next-Gen Chefs Will Be Robots

Key TakeawaysThe rise of robotic kitchens is turning kitchens...

Goa Needs a Desalination Plant Before Water Security Becomes a Crisis

Key TakeawaysThe tourism boom in Goa adds millions of...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img