AgustaWestland case: Delhi court permits accused Gautam Khaitan to travel abroad for six months

Key Takeaways

  • The Delhi court has permitted Gautam Khaitan, accused in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam case, to travel abroad for six months.
  • Khaitan has been asked to furnish a bank guarantee of Rs. 1 Crore and submit an affidavit disclosing his itinerary.
  • The Enforcement Directorate opposed the application, citing serious allegations against the accused.

New Delhi: A Delhi court on Thursday permitted lawyer Gautam Khaitan, an accused in the AgustaWestland VVIP chopper scam case, to travel abroad for six months.

Special Judge for CBI Sanjeev Aggarwal said, “In these facts and circumstances and considering his past conduct, applicant/accused Gautam Khaitan is permitted to travel abroad for six months”.

However, the court asked Khaitan to furnish security in the form of a bank guarantee of Rs.1 Crore or an FDR of like amount and submit an affidavit in the court disclosing his programme/itinerary, including flight numbers (to and fro), places of his stay at various stations abroad, and telephone numbers and addresses of his stay.

Khaitan was also asked to intimate the court 24 hours prior to leaving and within 72 hours of his return from abroad.

Khaitan has also been directed to file a complete self-attested copy of his passport along with a copy of his visa in the court on his return from abroad.

The court ordered Khaitan to neither tamper with the evidence nor try to influence any witness in any manner and not use the permission granted to him contrary to the rules.

In case he violates any of the conditions, the bank guarantee/FDR will be forfeited to the state.

The court also decreed that the accused should desist from requesting an extension for staying abroad.

Khaitan’s application sought to renew an earlier order and get permission to travel abroad for six months. The Enforcement Directorate opposed the application, citing serious allegations against the accused.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) opposed the application by submitting that the allegations against the accused are grave and in the past, Khaitan had met one Ms. Pareen Khan and tried to influence her not to come to India.

The ED submitted that the accused is also facing trial in a black money case, which entails imprisonment up to 7 years. The ED also stated that Khaitan hasnot mentioned why his physical presence is essential in those countries and the meetings can also be done through virtual mode.

The judge said, “I have gone through the rival contentions. The accused has been travelling extensively in the past, and nothing has been brought to the notice of this court that the accused had flouted any terms and conditions of the travel order or had not returned on time”

Hot this week

Could Oil Turn Somaliland into a Prosperous African Nation?

Key TakeawaysSomaliland's oil reserves hold the key to the...

35 pieces of Shraddha’s body

Love is a powerful emotion. Love inspires you to...

The ‘Thai’ Touch in India

Thai Massage Parlours in the most populous cities across...

‘Justice for Bhavyasri’ trends on social media, seeks fairness for 17-year-old

Key TakeawaysThe #JusticeForBhavyasri campaign gained momentum on social media...

The world is raving about Saudi Arabia’s rave party

I always thought that rave parties were the prerogative...

More than Laughter: The Quiet Power of Papa Yaar

Zakir Khan’s Papa Yaar deserves to be discussed as...

Behind Every Conflict Lies an Economic Equation

History teaches us that wars are rarely fought over...

What Happens When You Relocate after Buying a Health Insurance Policy

Key TakeawaysUpdate your address with the insurer promptly after...

Is the World at the Brink of a Global War?

Key TakeawaysThe world at the brink faces overlapping regional...

Why the World Lacks Ethical Integrity to Resolve Global Conflicts

Key TakeawaysThe world lacks Ethical Integrity, leading to inconsistent...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img